W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Proposal: @parsing="loose | strict"

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:53:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4A5D0C87.3050603@mit.edu>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> This is in fact what I am proposing. Let Web browser have the option of 
> switching to "authoring device" mode.

In that case, why does the web page need anything in it at all?  If web 
  browsers want to ship a strict non-default parser mode, that's fine. 
They can just do that.  No need to annotate pages to use it.

> I suppose you meant that a "CSS property alone wouldn't work". However, 
> by CSS, I did not mean only a CSS property, but also a new CSS/HTML 
> media device type (I did not mean a "MIME type"). The media type that we 
> target via the CSS selector '@media' or the HTML media attribute.

What's the point of the media type here?

> The thing is that a media device of course treats the whole page in a 
> certain way. This is programmed into the device before it starts reading 
> the page. Thus, the device also has some predefined CSS properties.

Not sure what you mean by that, exactly...

> If we had a "authoring device" media type (or a "authoring mode" sub 
> media type), then we could have a default
> 
>     @media authoring{parsing:strict}
> 
> for those devices/modes. If UAs could /switch/ their media mode, then 
> authors could also, with the touch of a button (which I think you 
> proposed, anyway), see the page in "authoring mode".

This has nothing to do with CSS or media, though.

> As a CSS property it would of course also be possible (for security or 
> other reason) to use
> 
>  @media all {parsing:strict}

I'm not clear on how you think this would work.  Care to explain?

-Boris
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 22:54:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:48 UTC