- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:03:37 +0300
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:26, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> I don't like downplayed errors. On one hand they want to be errors >> but >> on the other, they are something that are designed to be easily >> ignorable. I have dragged my feet with them hoping they'd go away. >> One >> day I almost started implementing them but then I got a higher- >> priority >> item to deal with. > > I've replaced downplayed errors with conforming features that trigger > warnings. I've also taken the opportunity to trim the list of features > that trigger this behaviour, so that we keep it to a minimum. I've implemented and deployed the normative warnings at http://html5.validator.nu . However, I elected not to implement the following: > For example, a validator could report some pages as "Valid HTML5" > and others as "Valid HTML5 with warnings". > I thought we agreed that we don't want multiple conformance classes. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2009 14:05:22 UTC