W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: formal objection to one vendor/one vote

From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:57:29 -0700
Message-ID: <B737B2055E864C2EB9AD5446B4961D32@joe1446a4150a8>
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
> ... and so the browser vendors ignored it.

<video> and <audio> having three that recognize the elements and some 
mimes/extensions, and even play by tech that appears to be open and 
free is a spectacular achievement in this focus on making multiple 
media accessible to authors and WWW interactors. Now we may have a 
comprehendable platform for major standard types of embedded content 
(plus seamless iframe to hold them all) and all rigged to work in a 
designed plan of
progressive/selective fallback/enhancement.

I think I am hoping that any implementors that have something running 
or in work should be the next consensus group that validates best 
practice of what is described now, and then provide the group with a 
short list of widely achievable minimum support requirements.

Thanks to All and Best Regards,
Received on Sunday, 12 July 2009 07:58:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:51 UTC