- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:20:13 +0100
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Murray Maloney wrote: > At 04:41 PM 7/8/2009 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> For these reasons, I think it is helpful to explain the problems with >> summary="", more so than for the other attributes. I think the >> explanation could be either in the section on explanatory information >> for tables, or in the obsolete features section, but either way I >> think it is helpful to provide it. >> >> That being said, I don't really want to micromanage the exact spec >> text. I'm just explaining why I think further explanatory material in >> the spec text is merited. > > I agree that further explanatory text is needed, but I am not so sure > that it needs to be so pejorative. +1. There will be a vote on the status of @summary (and its future). Personally I would prefer if there were no re-jigging of the spec until the @summary vote has been completed. Cheers Josh
Received on Thursday, 9 July 2009 07:21:04 UTC