W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:39:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0907082239130.1976@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> For many of the other obsolete features, the basic position is that they 
> should not be used in new documents, but it may not be worth expending 
> effort to purge them from old documents. So just labeling them obsolete 
> gives enough guidance to authors and conformance checkers. But 
> summary="" is not quite like that.

In what sense is it different? I thought it was exactly like that; that's 
why I edited the spec as I did.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 22:40:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:48 UTC