W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio>

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:11:55 +0000 (UTC)
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>, robert@ocallahan.org, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0907062209270.1053@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > I'm suggesting we make Theora the base codec endorsed by W3C and HTML. 
> > But leave Apple, and anyone else, free to implement additional codecs 
> > such as H.264.
> I support this position. This is what the HTML5 draft stated when the 
> <video> element was introduced. Bringing it back would heal the 
> community and improve interoperability.

It would do nothing to the level of interoperability we have, and it would 
only heal the community in the sense that giving presents to a child when 
he's upset helps "heal" the child. IMHO.

Ignoring the fact that one of the major browser vendors has point-blank 
refused to implement this part of the spec is not how we make progress.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 22:12:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:47 UTC