W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: consensus (was: Codecs for <video> and <audio>)

From: Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:39:03 -0400
To: "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uwf2zbpi1ejg13@sandra-svwliu01>
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:38:39 -0400, Silvia Pfeiffer  
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

> SHOULD is better than specifying nothing because it gives confidence
> in a selection that was made by the working group. But it's just
> nothing that can be relied on.
>
> So I conder: is SHOULD good enough? If we want a useful baseline codec
> we probably have to make it a requirement.

O.K., let's vote on that too.


> Regards,
> Silvia.
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Michael A. Puls II<shadow2531@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> We haven't voted on anything in ages. How bout we vote on whether or  
>> not we
>> want a SHOULD level for Vorbis for <audio> at least?
>>
>> And, if not now, at some time, let's vote on whether or not we want a  
>> SHOULD
>> level for Theora for <video>.
>>
>> --
>> Michael
>>
>>


-- 
Michael
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 14:38:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:47 UTC