- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:53:44 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 6/30/09 12:50 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > I have therefore removed the two subsections in the HTML5 spec in which > codecs would have been required, and have instead left the matter > The spec should include a section noting that patent encumbered codecs are required for interoperability. In other words, Google Chrome's approach is the only one that ensures interoperability. > undefined, as has in the past been done with other features like<img> and > image formats,<embed> and plugin APIs, or Web fonts and font formats. > I believe that is what's called "the bad old way of doing things" among #whatwg denizens. - Rob
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 17:54:29 UTC