- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:54:00 +0100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> I have updated the counter-proposal located on the ESW Wiki at >>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/KeepMicrodata . >>> >>> ~TJ >> "If Microdata were to be split from the HTML spec, it is possible that >> control of it would move to a separate working group, which would move part >> of HTML's development out of the hands of the working group chartered to >> develop HTML." >> >> How so, without the HTML WG agreeing to that? > > HTML says that other specs may allow other specs to declare other > things to be valid. It doesn't say that these specs must be developed > by the HTML WG, or indeed the W3C. > ... Yes. But what does this have to do with Microdata? If it starts as a W3C HTML WG Working Draft, why would it end up somewhere else without the WG's agreement? BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 10:54:45 UTC