- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:48:01 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-id: <7F491D8B-8EB0-412B-ABA4-28534EC9F32A@apple.com>
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:24:23 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> This issue has been open for five months, and the only concrete >> proposal we have at this point is in the draft. The deadline given >> for >> this work was December 17[1], a date that is fast approaching. At >> this >> time the chairs would like to solicit volunteers to write Change >> Proposals. >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/74 >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation >> >> If no Change Proposals are written by January 16, 2010 this issue >> will >> be closed without prejudice. (That's an extra 8 days over the usual >> one month deadline to account for the winter holidays.) > > There is active work in this area, and there appears to be > convergence on > at least the outlines of agreement. But as we are actvely working on > it I > expect to see some instability still, which makes a change proposal > a bit > tricky... > > Given the complexity of the problem, I think that's pretty good. If > nothing else is forthcoming I will write a change proposal in January. It's ok if the initial Change Proposal is preliminary. As you have probably seen, there is plenty of opportunity in the process for revising and updating. I will put you down as a volunteer. Is January 16th an ok deadline, or would you like to adjust that in either direction? Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 17:48:35 UTC