- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:44:30 -0800
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Dec 7, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> I'm not sure that anyone is advocating splitting HTML from the HTML >> DOM. I'm not sure it's worth discussing in depth unless someone >> wants to propose doing it. > > +1 > >> If anyone does want to make that case that some aspects of the HTML >> spec should be split from the spec for the HTML DOM, then the >> burden of proof would be on them to show that this is (a) feasible >> and (b) an overall improvement. > > re: (a) +1 > re: (b) -1 > > In the (at present, purely hypothetical case) where somebody wishes > to actively pursue this AND demonstrates that it is feasible, then > we would need rationales for both sides. To clarify, what I meant by (b) is that a Change Proposal without rationale would not be considered a valid Change Proposal. Thus, the person wishing to pursue this would have to provide an initial rationale, before anyone would be obligated to provide the opposing rationale. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 18:45:03 UTC