- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:46:10 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: masinter@adobe.com, public-html@w3.org
David Carlisle wrote: > One possible disadvantage of the form with PUBLIC only is that it can't > be used in XML so you can't easily preserve the versioning information > marked this way into the XHTML serialisation. > > You could of course make it well formed XML again by adding a random > system identifier eg "" or about:legacy-compat but it may be clearer if > the SYSTEM rather than public identifier were used, eg > > <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:HTML-20100401"> > > <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:W3C-HTML5"> > > or something.... Could we use the URN (RFC 3151) variant, such as: <!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "urn:publicid:-:W3C+HTMLWG:HTML+20100401"> for the publicid "-//W3C HTMLWG//HTML 20100401"? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 14:46:53 UTC