- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:43:37 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >> Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, 2009-08-26 02:28 +0000: >>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>>> If we actually defined each element and each attribute in the way >>>> that HTML4 does *and* define its operational behavior for the DOM >>>> then the specification would satisfy all implementations. >>> I don't know what it means to "define" an element if that is not to >>> define its operational behaviour. >> It means defining what the element represents. > > "represents" in the HTML5 spec when used about elements and attributes is > a term that just refers to the media-independent rendering of those > features, which as far as I can tell doesn't apply to <a name>. Did you > have something else in mind? With all due respect, Ian: I think it's obvious that Mike has in mind, and it's not what you said. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 19:44:23 UTC