- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:35:46 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 21:14 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [...] > I'd like to ask the Chairs and Team Contacts for a their input on how > to track issues that should not block Last Call, but should block PR. > The need for such a status has become clear not only with this issue, > but also with the issue of "about" registration. > > Dan Connolly proposed that issues marked as "Pending Review" can be > treated as blocking PR but not LC. I don't think that works, given our > current definition of Pending Review, which is that consensus has not > yet been assessed (which might well indicate the issue blocks Last > Call). > > My proposal, create a new product in the tracker, "HTML5 spec PR". > Issues that block PR but not Last Call would be moved to this new > product. That works for me. > Once we enter CR, we would merge back to a single set of > issues. I would love to hear other suggetions. > > Regards, > Maciej -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 14:35:56 UTC