Minor technical corrigendum: On Aug 22, 2009, at 3:21 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > My understanding is than Ian considers, for example, issue 8 as > closed, though the Working Group does not. In operational terms, > that means that he plans no further action on that item until or > unless he gets either new information or direction from the working > group. By contrast, the three I listed I was assuming that Ian was > planning on working on, and indeed he confirmed that. My understanding is that the Working Group does consider issue 8 as closed, as indicated by its CLOSED status in the tracker: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/8 >. 'm assuming you misspoke, and what you say is probably true as to some other issue. But just in case, I wanted to make sure it wasn't your intent to reopen ISSUE-8. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 23 August 2009 03:10:32 UTC