Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> ... >>> Do you believe the following changes would be appropriate and >>> sufficient to resolve the issue, if made: >>> 1) Replace references to WEBADDRESS with references to IRIbis. >> >> Yes. > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7391 > (I believe this is blocked on an IRIbis update.) And has already been set to "resolved" by Ian. It's not. >>> 2) Replace term URL with something either matching IRIbis or at least >>> not conflicting. >> >> Yes. > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7392 This one already has been set to "WONTFIX" by the author. Maybe moving over to Bugzilla doesn't really help in dealing with these issues. >>> If so, then I'll file bugs for these suggested changes. #1 may >>> require a sufficiently updated version of IRIbis. >> >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-06#section-7.4> > > Apparently this is not yet sufficient, see <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0808.html>. I do not disagree that there is a problem. But we're not going to resolve it by closing issue 56 until we're there. BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 21 August 2009 08:22:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC