- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:24:58 +0200
- To: Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:30:23 +0200, Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com> wrote: > At Google, the encoding label is taken only as a weak signal (a small > factor in the heuristic detection). It is completely overwhelmed by the byte > content analysis. (There are too many unlabeled pages *and mislabeled > pages*for the label to be used as is.) I presume this is not the case for Google Chrome, or is it? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 22:25:54 UTC