W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: HTML5 Issue 11 (encoding detection): I18N WG response...

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:24:58 +0200
To: Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uyze7wg664w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:30:23 +0200, Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com> wrote:
> At Google, the encoding label is taken only as a weak signal (a small  
> factor in the heuristic detection). It is completely overwhelmed by the byte
> content analysis. (There are too many unlabeled pages *and mislabeled
> pages*for the label to be used as is.)

I presume this is not the case for Google Chrome, or is it?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 22:25:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC