- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:27:29 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Keith" <jeremy@adactio.com>, "HTML WG Public List" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:00:20 +0100, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com> wrote: > <article> > <header> > <h2><a href="blah" rel="bookmark">Accessibility of HTML5 video</ > a></h2> > <time datetime="2009-07-30" pubdate>Thursday 30 July 2009</time> > </header> > <p>Brilliantly witty, incisive prose, in a gloriously elegiac style > reminiscent of <cite>Cider With Rosie</cite>.</p> > </article> > > That would still leave one problem which is how user agents should deal > with multiple instances of TIME elements with @pubdate attributes within > an ARTICLE (though I imagine that kind of authoring could be considered > non-conforming). > > Thoughts? The parsing rule could be simply that the first pubdate in any section/ article context is considered to over-ride any other inside the same sectiom/article. b
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:28:40 UTC