- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:02:51 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Julian Reschke wrote: > James Graham wrote: >> ... >> I now have a version of the spec with links to open ISSUEs [1]. See >> [2] for an example of a section where it applies. The issues are added >> using an extra metadata file that contains a map between each issue >> and one or more sections in the spec. The file I have created so far >> is at [3]; it ... > > This is great and is going to be very helpful in the future. > > I just checked one section I happen to be interested in: > > <http://hoppipolla.co.uk/410/spec-full.html#hyperlink-auditing> > > and found that it refers to ISSUE-63 (Origin), which is related, but not > ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 (PING and PINGUI). Oversight? I haven't added any ISSUEs with a status of RAISED rather than OPEN yet. They will be added as soon as I get around to it. If anyone would like to suggest which section(s) the RAISED issues should be associated with that would be a considerable help.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 09:02:51 UTC