- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:27:19 -0400
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- CC: Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, www-smil@w3.org
Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > Dick Bulterman <Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl>, 2009-08-17 08:51 +0200: > [...] >> Unfortunately, I'm away from both my office and a computer this week (on a >> sailboat), so it will take a few days for me to round things out. I'll send >> off comments at the beginning of the week of 24 August. > > The team members of the W3C Interaction domain had a discussion > about this issue on our weekly call, and I took an action to > request that it be kept open pending receipt of Dick's review > comments next week. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/135 > Also, it seems that the scope of the discussion about issue-10 has > expanded to include more than just the question "how similar > should SMIL and <video> attribute names be?" (the current title of > the issue). We could open up a new issue with a more broadly > scoped title, but I'd suggest that rather than doing that, the > issue be re-titled instead. > > Dick, You also might want to consider attending the HTML WG telcon > on Thursday, August 27 to talk about your review comments. > > --Mike - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:28:02 UTC