- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:52:29 +0300
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'W3C WAI-XTECH'" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Aug 13, 2009, at 22:54, John Foliot wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> >> The email you cite is not an objection from the PFWG. It is an email >> by individuals. The overlap with PFWG participants is small. >> > > For the record: > WAI does not have a formal 'membership', The PFWG has, though. > Is there a problem with that? I wasn't pointing out any problem with the email itself. I was pointing out that a statement about provenance of the email wasn't factual. When one is discussing HTML5 controversies (and especially when one is documenting them for the general public), I think it's important to be diligent and to keep statements factual to avoid inadvertently giving an embellished impression of the controversies. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 07:53:31 UTC