Henri Sivonen wrote: > > > The email you cite is not an objection from the PFWG. It is an email > by individuals. The overlap with PFWG participants is small. > For the record: WAI does not have a formal 'membership', however all of the signatories have involved themselves in various WAI activities in the past. "WAI welcomes... * participation from around the world * volunteers to review, implement, and promote guidelines * dedicated participants in working groups" [source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ ] As well, the fact that the signatories (volunteers all) are not all PFWG members should in no way diminish the fact that a collection of accessibility advocates, who have contributed to the W3C now and in the past, collectively feel/felt that there is a real problem with process, *AND* rather than just complain took constructive action to try and remedy that problem. Is there a problem with that? JFReceived on Thursday, 13 August 2009 19:54:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC