- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:43:51 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Dick.Bulterman@cwi.nl, ehyche@real.com, Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, www-smil@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > Taking silence as assent on this sort of thing is > tricky... I'm checking internally with the W3C staff, > but one thing I've forgotten to do in some other > cases is also check directly with the chairs and WGs. The real issue is that this (as well as other) issues have sat dormant with no forward progress for a long period of time. > Dick, Eric, would you please > (a) acknowledge receipt, > (b) let us know whether the SMIL WG is OK with this? > > If you can't do them both in a few days, please do > (a) and estimate when you can do (b). That's exactly what we need. If this request attracts an owner and a schedule to either close the issue or to identify tangible changes that need to be taken to HTML5, then the issue will remain open. - Sam Ruby > On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 02:41 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:26 AM, Olivier GENDRIN wrote: >> >>> (+cc www-smil) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/10 >>>> >>>> Since this issue was raised, there has not been significant >>>> interest in >>>> changing the attribute names on <video> and <audio> to match SMIL >>>> elements. >>>> I suggest we close this issue. Anyone who wants to make a technical >>>> case for >>>> changing one or more of the attributes would remain free to do so. >>> Did we recieved any advice from the smil team about this ? >> We had this input from the SYMM WG on December, 2007: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Dec/0219.html >> >> This linked to a detailed comparison, but there was apparently little >> interest in changing HTML5 <video> to be more like SMIL, since the >> message received no replies and there was no follow-up. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >>
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 22:44:39 UTC