- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:52:18 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: >> ... >> It seems like, from what you are saying, is that a Formal Objection >> is more along the lines of giving a sense of openness within the W3C, >> but the openness is more of an illusion than fact. >> >> I understand about presenting a technical argument, but if all the WG >> has to do is "claim" that it gave due consideration to the technical >> issues raised, then there is no real option. After all, this WG >> believes it is giving due consideration to the summary attribute, or the > > ... > > No, the WG does not believe that. At least not as far as I am concerned. > >> ... > > BR, Julian > Understood, Julian. Shelley
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:52:33 UTC