- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:35:36 +0200
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Shelley Powers wrote: > ... > It seems like, from what you are saying, is that a Formal Objection is > more along the lines of giving a sense of openness within the W3C, but > the openness is more of an illusion than fact. > > I understand about presenting a technical argument, but if all the WG > has to do is "claim" that it gave due consideration to the technical > issues raised, then there is no real option. After all, this WG believes > it is giving due consideration to the summary attribute, or the > ... No, the WG does not believe that. At least not as far as I am concerned. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 12:36:28 UTC