W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

<canvas> and the 2D context API (was RE: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010)

From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:09:56 -0700
To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9EF3B2C14D3B794EB33689E0E1BDFEEA3B1E41A151@NA-EXMSG-C120.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:37 PM, Shelley Powers wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
> > I will also say that while I truly did not have an idea how the
> > current poll would end up (and even though there does appear to be a
> > trend at the moment, I'm still not certain), I do have a strong
> > intuition on what the consensus would be on canvas at the moment.

> The current working group may consider that the current charter can be
> stretched to include Canvas, but I'm not sure others outside of the
> group would agree. (Though I'm not sure that the working group of today
> would necessarily vote the same -- the makeup of the group is different.
> Views about the Canvas element are also different. )

My understanding is that the WG decision was that canvas was in scope for
the working group. The mail documenting the decision [1] indicates that
there was some support for the 2D context API being documented separately:

  We also note support for splitting the immediate mode graphics API
  out of the HTML 5 spec and inten to pursue that option by
  recruiting writing resources.

I don't know whether having the <canvas> element defined in the HTML 5 spec but the graphics API in a separate document solves the accessibility issue at the root of this thread. I suspect there is some relationship since a different API would likely require different accessibility support.

Nonetheless, I think Microsoft would support that separation since, amongst other things, it would allow the graphics API to proceed in the longer term on a different rhythm to the HTML 5 spec itself.



[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Dec/0094.html
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 00:12:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC