[wbs] response to 'Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings?'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Publish HTML 5
update with or without warnings?' (HTML Working Group) for Jace Voracek.



---------------------------------
Publish draft without warnings?
----
Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., without 
the additional warnings, also a.k.a. Ian's draft) as a Working Draft at
this time?



 * (x) Yes
 * ( ) No

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 





---------------------------------
Publish draft with warnings?
----
Do you support publishing this Editor's draft (i.e., with 
additional warnings, also a.k.a. Manu's draft) as a Working Draft at this
time?
In order to provide more useful feedback regarding which warning text
should not be considered controversial and thus, should be removed,
please follow the suggestions outlined in this email.


 * ( ) Yes
 * (x) No

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 





---------------------------------
What to publish?
----
Given that these documents differ only in the presence or absence of
warnings, how would you like the results of the poll to be interpreted?



 * ( ) I would prefer to publish all Editor's Drafts that have majority
approval as Working Drafts.
 * (x) I prefer to publish only the one Editor's Draft receiving the most
votes as a Working Draft.

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
Although I believe that publishing these approved drafts would be
acceptable for those that have a preference, I conclude that taking a vote
of which individual draft to publish will lead to the best outcome.



These answers were last modified on 12 August 2009 at 18:27:56 U.T.C.
by Jace Voracek

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/ until 2009-08-17.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:32:10 UTC