- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:39:35 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Shelley Powers wrote: >> Julian, I was going to enter it, but will hold off if you're going >> to. It is connected to your predefined vocabularies issue. In fact, >> Manu that's another issue that could be marked in your document, >> though your overall section issue could cover that. > > Shelley, if you have proposed text by all means send it for review. I'm not sure what you mean by proposed text. I was basically going to take Manu's concerns, as expressed in the document, and post to a new open issue, because of Sam's concerns that the document reflects issues that are not in the issues database. If that's sufficient, that's what I'll do. If not, then I won't open any issue, and someone else will need to. > > Re: "predefined vocabularies" -- my understanding is that this is > *part* of micro data, thus doesn't need to be mentioned separately. On > the other hand, should the WG decide to keep micro data, then we'll > have to discuss this separately then. > >> If the person who raises the issue "owns" the issue, Manu would you >> rather "own" this issue? I'm willing to "own" it, but I'm not a >> member of the RDFa group, and haven't been specifically involved in >> the current effort. However, willing to help. Just holler. > > BR, Julian > > > Shelley
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 17:40:24 UTC