- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:37:49 +0200
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>, 'Manu Sporny' <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, 'HTMLWG WG' <public-html@w3.org>
[ deleted cc to whatwg to make Ian happy ] John Foliot On 09-08-09 23.59: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> If we indeed have a draft, then I'd like to have the option to vote >> yes or no on either draft independently, instead of either-or. For >> example, some people may wish to vote for both, and I would like to >> have that opportunity, though I would probably only exercise it if >> Manu's draft is changed. Sam's call for multiple drafts was based on >> the premise that they would be published independently, not that we'd >> have either-or votes. > > I agree. At this time there is no harm in having 2 efforts being > recognized as serious proposals, and in fact that may be a good thing. > "Say that you can do X, Y or Z" instead of "Don't do X"... +1 >> If you limit your list to open issues that have been unresolved for at >> least 6 months without meaningful progress (with reference to an issue >> tracker issue, or a mailing list post, dating back at least 6 months) >> and if you remove the other (seemingly unintended) technical >> differences from Ian's draft (such as adding back the Database >> section), then I will support publication of your draft in addition to >> Ian's. > > +1 Sharing the load is a Good Thing (tm) +1 -- leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 22:38:32 UTC