- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Maciej Stachowiak'" <mjs@apple.com>, "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, "'WHATWG'" <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > If we indeed have a draft, then I'd like to have the option to vote > yes or no on either draft independently, instead of either-or. For > example, some people may wish to vote for both, and I would like to > have that opportunity, though I would probably only exercise it if > Manu's draft is changed. Sam's call for multiple drafts was based on > the premise that they would be published independently, not that we'd > have either-or votes. I agree. At this time there is no harm in having 2 efforts being recognized as serious proposals, and in fact that may be a good thing. "Say that you can do X, Y or Z" instead of "Don't do X"... > > If you limit your list to open issues that have been unresolved for at > least 6 months without meaningful progress (with reference to an issue > tracker issue, or a mailing list post, dating back at least 6 months) > and if you remove the other (seemingly unintended) technical > differences from Ian's draft (such as adding back the Database > section), then I will support publication of your draft in addition to > Ian's. +1 Sharing the load is a Good Thing (tm) JF
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 21:59:59 UTC