- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > > > If the idea is to mark up all the issues where someone disagrees, then > there are a number of other sections we should mark, in addition to all > those that have XXX markers in the source already, those that have bugs > filed, and those for which outstanding e-mail feedback is pending: > > - The allowance of /> syntax on certain tags, e.g. <br/>, in the > text/html syntax > <snip> > > The list could probably go on for a long time. Thanks for this useful list of outstanding issues Ian. I too appreciate that there are likely many other issues unresolved, but this appears to be a good high-level start. I am curious, has WHAT WG reached out to relevant Working Groups within and/or external to W3C seeking assistance in resolving any of these areas? Handing off contentious issues to a group to work on seems an efficient process for moving forward, especially with deadlines fast approaching; it would seem that "...600 outstanding e-mails" [1] is a heavy burden for any one person to have to carry alone, especially given the gravidity of some of these outstanding issues. JF [1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0417.html ]
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 20:44:41 UTC