- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@opera.com>, "'Leif Halvard Silli'" <lhs@malform.no>
Sam Ruby wrote > > Sam Ruby wrote: > > Given the number of objections, I don't believe that they can all be > > resolved by Monday, so here are the options I have heard so far. > > > > 1) Publish Ian's draft as is, along with the HTML 5 differences > > from HTML 4. [SR] > > 3) Publish Ian's draft, the HTML 5 differences from HTML 4, and > > Mike's draft. [LM, JF1] > > 4) Instruct Mike Smith to work with Ian to incorporate [text to > > be provided by John Foliot] into Ian's draft [JF2] > > Unless I'm misreading, the number of poll options have gone from 5 to 3 > (I very much like the direction this is taking!). I base this on the > following emails (people are welcome to correct me if I got this > wrong)... > > Dropping 2: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0938.html > > Dropping 5: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0940.html > Sam, Given Mike's indication that he is not prepared to offer his draft for consideration at this time [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0012.html ] I withdraw my first objection (noted above as [JF1]) at this time. The editor has signaled that he is willing to act upon my other objection [JF2] and it is my impression that I will be able to remove my second objection as well. JF
Received on Saturday, 1 August 2009 19:02:01 UTC