Re: SVG Semantics Re: SVG and MathML in text/html

On Sep 30, 2008, at 02:27, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Our conclusion is that something more like the SVG-WG proposal and  
> less like the original proposal incorporated in the spec (we're not  
> convinced that it is perfect yet, but they are also waiting on Ian's  
> feedback in particular) will be substantially easier to implement  
> effectively in the actual browser.


I've put some though into how one might implement HTML5 parsing in  
Gecko, and I'm pretty convinced that, in the context of Gecko, the  
commented out proposal is easier to implement than the SVG WG's  
proposal would be.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 16:15:31 UTC