Minor clarrification : Is CHOICE a good solution? (was RE: Is longdesc a good solution? (was: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>)) from John Foliot on 2008-09-08 (public-html@w3.org from September 2008)

From: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:43:35 -0700
To: "'James Craig'" <jcraig@apple.com>
Cc: "'Lachlan Hunt'" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006d01c911e2$cd02be80$1b2e42ab@stanford.edu>

John Foliot wrote:
> The relevancy or irrelevancy of providing information to end
> users is not for authors to decide: 

In actual fact, the author *has* decided, and chose to use specific images
to convey some information to the end user.  Why use a collage of 2 photos
and the mission patch for an article about the Atlantis Mission?  Could not
they have simply provided a photograph of the shuttle itself?  The choice of
using 3 images in a collage attaches relevancy to all three images.

JF

Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 18:44:15 UTC