- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:19:55 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Joshue O Connor wrote: >> Ian Hickson wrote: >>> I hate to throw fuel on the fire here, but as far as longdesc="" is >>> concerned, the reason it isn't in HTML5 is that there has never been >>> any feedback sent that described a problem for which longdesc="" was >>> even remotely considered as a solution. >> Secondly, what about the need for a long descriptor? The authors of HTML 4 saw >> a need for it. Has this need gone away? > > What is the problem that a long description is solving? A long description > isn't a need, it's a solution to a need/requirement/problem. If the need > is something like "users who can't see bar charts need a way to have the > information in the bar chart conveyed to them", why isn't <p> sufficient? If the information /is/ on the page and this can be indicated to the user in some way via ARIA described by or similar then in principle yes, fair point. Usually @longdesc is explicitly associated with <img>. [1] > Are there any examples where putting the information on a different page > in a way that requires explicit activation to show the information is ever > a significantly better solution than just having the information be right > there in the page for everyone to see? No probably not. How the information is presented to the user is partly a user agent issue and this is where @longdesc has suffered due to poor support/implementation etc. In an ideal world, I would like to see the @longdesc content pre-loaded/buffered with the user able to access it via a user agent keystroke without even having to leave the host <img> elements focus. Cheers Josh [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG
Received on Monday, 8 September 2008 08:20:42 UTC