- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:31:02 +0100
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html Group <public-html@w3.org>
CC: - wai-xtech@w3.org (this isn't relevant for them at all) On 6 Sep 2008, at 13:22, Laura Carlson wrote: > - Attending teleconferences Per our charter technical discussion primarily happens on public-html. Why should I spend my money attending a teleconference? > - Participating in discussions on list and at teleconferences OK, fair enough. > - Defining and tracking issues > - Gathering information > - Providing rationale As far as I can see more or less everyone has been doing all three of these. > - Seeking PF's advice It seems sane to have one or two people acting as links between WGs, but we aren't chartered to blindingly follow their advice. We do not have to follow it, even if you'd like us to. > - Researching and testing > - Fulfilling actions > - Posting results to the list And again, everyone has been doing this… There is no clear consensus either way. I have not seen the editor actually make a decision, nor write either side off. On 26 Aug 2008, at 09:44, Ian Hickson wrote: > But the whole point is here that I haven't "decided" yet either. I > haven't > even carefully looked at the feedback yet. -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2008 18:31:40 UTC