Re: several messages

Lachlan Hunt wrote:

> I don't think it's fair that HTML5 should bend over backwards to cater
> for XSLT any more than other authoring tools, especially when, as you
> pointed out, the DOCTYPE is only a very minor issue compared with
> supporting all the other new features of HTML5.  Just accept the fact
> that XSLT 1.0 is not designed for outputting HTML5 and is limited to
> outputting a mostly HTML4 compatible subset of it, and get one with
> defining the new output method that solves all the issues together.

I would really appreciate if you can go through all previous
correspondence related to this issue and then try to evaluate how your
statement fits within HTML WG charter.

> Also, I think the idea of this WG defining a new output method for XSLT
> is absurd.

Indeed, were I proposing that?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------