- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:32:07 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:18:30 +0200, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: >> The second issue, is development of completely new output method for >> HTML5 in future versions of XSLT. This output method has to accommodate >> changes made in HTML5 from HTML4 including for example: >> >> - extended list of void elements >> - change of namespace, HTML4 documents were not in namespace >> - proper serialization of vocabularies that have or will have special >> standing in HTML5, like MathML or SVG >> - ... >> >> Once are those issues related to serialization of HTML5 somehow frozen >> or at least enough stable I'm going to propose new output method in XSL >> WG. However I'm not sure if such method will find its way into real W3C >> Recommendation unless HTML5 is at least Proposed Recommendation. >> >> So, if 2015 XSLT 3.0 will be commonly used with output method >> appropriate for HTML5 we can drop "XSLT-compat", until then we should >> keep it. > > Does XSLT allow other specifications to define an output method? > Defining it seems pretty trivial and could just be part of HTML5. Of course it does, using a qualified name. BR, Julian (ducks)
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 11:32:58 UTC