- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:58:50 -0400
- To: "'Ivan Enderlin'" <w3c@hoa-project.net>
- Cc: "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Ivan - Yes, my goal was the latter. By highlighting just how bad it is to carry the "magic quote" proposal to its logical conclusion, I was hoping to show that its beginning is a bad idea too. I have no objection to people doing this in CSS. Just don't try to put it in the HTML spec! J.Ja > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Ivan Enderlin > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:29 AM > To: Justin James > Cc: 'HTML WG' > Subject: Re: <q> and commas > > > Justin James a écrit : > > Let's suppose for a moment that we decide to keep the behavior of<q>, > to > > automatically generate quote marks. > > > […] > > So, what should HTML do about this? If we've decided that HTML should > insert > > the appropriate quotation marks which function purely as > presentational > > delimiters, then I propose that it should also add the commas. > Manage quotation marks is logical/meaningful (if we suppose it should > be), but manage commas is … very strange :s. A quote does not > absolutely > required a comma to start or to end (in French at least). The only > thing > we must act upon is the quotation marks, not others punctuations. > Unless if the goal of your mail is to point the fact that manage > quotations marks is not a good idea ? > > Regards. > > -- > Ivan Enderlin > Developper of Hoa Framework > http://hoa-project.net/ >
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:59:52 UTC