W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2008


From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:01:00 -0700
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D12127075745E648BBC075EF46983E171D12A20408@TK5-EXMBX-W603v.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
I'd like to suggest a different strategy for <q>.  I'm not comfortable with a strategy that directly says you must break the only required rendering rule in HTML4.01 in order to be compliant with HTML5.  I believe we should pick one of the following options: 1) it should either be removed, 2) required to quote, knowing there are nesting/locale problems, 3) required to quote unless the immediately contained characters are quote characters, allowing locale-specific or nesting-specific author choice, 4) nest automatically with an attribute to control quoting, or 5) (my least favorite option) leave it ambiguous.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 13:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:38 UTC