- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 00:33:57 -0400
- To: "'Robert J Burns'" <rob@robburns.com>, "'HTML Issue Tracking WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
I can't figure out this wiki thing enough to put my comments on there, so I will have to do it on the list instead (I suspect that the wiki is the "right" place for it, but without a way of using it...). Looking at this, I am curious as to why in the world, after 10 years of begging people to separate their styling from their semantics, we would then turn around and make a mechanism that allows people to embed content and semantics (in this case, putting a string with a legend text is certainly a form of content) into the style sheet. This really looks like a massive step backwards. In this case, people should be using a tag in HTML with a *role* of "legend" (and another attribute indicating the ID of the tag that it is the legend of), with a stylesheet to style the legend itself. The legend text does not belong in a *style* definition. J.Ja -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert J Burns Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:40 PM To: HTML Issue Tracking WG Subject: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics Dear WG, Here is another issue that needs to be introduced here for discussion, as it will be added to the issue-tracker in time. This idea has been discussed briefly within the WG and more off-list. I welcome additional feedback now. As this involves nearly entirely only CSS, it would merely be a rough draft proposed to the CSS WG from the HTML WG if the WG decides to do so. Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the semantics of styling.[1] Take care, Rob [1]: <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SemanticPresentationLegendCSS>
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 04:35:10 UTC