W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Next steps for the ARIA syntax discussion

From: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:15 +0200
To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org, "public-xhtml2@w3.org" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF77EA9F87.10ABF173-ONC1257451.00570390-C1257451.005726C6@us.ibm.com>
> > I'm very concerned that there is not a realistic view about how much 
> > will hurt authors.
> I agree that if things were as bad as you thought they were, that
> would be a problem.  But I hope I've shown above that they are _not_
> as bad as you thought.

You don't think the fact that I got 2 different DOMs for the same 
attribute in my XHTML is a problem? That happens when your instructions 
are followed correct?

- Aaron
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 15:53:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:31 UTC