Steven Faulkner wrote: > Hi Ian, > I really would like to know why you have included a conformance > requirement in the spec, that is impossible to check without having to > talk to the author? That doesn't seem so far away from many other non-machine checkable conformance requirements in the spec. For example, similar out of band information would be needed to check that the contents of the <address> element were really intended to be "the contact information for the section it applies to". -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are DeadReceived on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 14:26:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:31 UTC