- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:32:49 -0500
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Steven Faulkner wrote: > i am not going to bother responding to the the rest of your inflamatory guff. I would actually rather like to see a response to this: >> So wait. Do you actually understand the logic behind WCAG 2.0 on this or >> other points? If so, then refusing the explain the logic seems like a >> needless lack of collegiality. If not, does that mean you have just taken >> WCAG 2.0 on faith and applied it without understanding the underlying logic? >> If that is the case, then I do not understand how your proposal can be >> meaningfully discussed. I feel that it would help me, as an implementor, to understand the reasons for the WCAG 2.0 decisions, not just read the final product... -Boris
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 19:33:50 UTC