- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:54:40 +0200
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Justin James wrote: > The difference is, my proposal takes away the styling advantages of using > the wrong tag. It is quite common to see <h1> where the goal was really > <span style="font-size: large; font-weight: bold;">. Or <em>USS > Constitution</em> when semantically that is wholly incorrect. By taking away > the default stylings, and separating the role from the styling, you stop > seeing this. Since all we'd be left with is div and span, your proposal also takes away any incentive for authors to bother using the correct markup. All we would get is people using <div style="..."> for everything, and you instantly lose all semantics and accessibility. You're proposal is basically suffering from an extreme case of div-itis. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 09:12:58 UTC