On Fri, 9 May 2008, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > > That said, I don't think we should just publish an updated draft of the > spec without also publishing a "changelog" or "release notes" document > that provides high-level descriptions of the substantive (non-editorial) > changes that have been made to spec since the FPWD. I'm all for that... who should take ownership of that deliverable, and how long would creating such a document take? (i.e. how long should we resonably wait before deciding that we should publish the spec anyway?) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 07:20:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:30 UTC