Re: A couple of HTML5 editorial comments

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> 
> Just a couple of editorial comments as I was browsing the spec 
> (originally mentioned in 
> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20070625#l-35)
> 
> In 4.1 “Browsing Contexts”, one of the green notes has a [DOM3VIEWS] 
> reference, but that should probably be [DOM2VIEWS].

That will get fixed when the references section is done -- hopefully by 
then there really will be a DOM3VIEWS.


> In 4.1.4 “Threads”, there’s a sentence
> 
>   The transitive closure of all the browsing contexts that are directly
>   reachable browsing contexts consists of a unit of related browsing
>   contexts.
> 
> which i think should be s/consists of/forms/ or something like that.
> That, or switch the subject and object of the sentence around.

Fixed.


> In 4.2.3 “APIs for creating and navigating browsing contexts by 
> name”, the link in the note at the end would be better with the text 
> “is unset” rather than “gets reset”, to bring it in line with 
> the wording from the section linked to.

Actually I mean "reset" because it might just as easily get set (e.g. when 
traversing back through history) as unset.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'