- From: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 17:37:48 +0000
- To: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On May 3, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Smylers wrote: > 1 This webpage conforms to the HTML 5 standard except that it > includes > unknown images from external sources for which we are unable to > provide alterternative text. This conveys another myth we need to dispel immediately. Few should ever be authoring a page where they do not know why they included an image on the page (perhaps this is part of the same misconception I'm already trying to dispel). All anyone has to do is remove the image from the page, decide whether the page is missing something important in not having that image there. If it is, put the image back and briefly describe what was missing without the image. Perhaps you or someone could point us to a real world example of a page where you think the purpose of the image on the page is inexplicable. That way we could continue the dialog and demonstrate that it's not the case. I can imagine some ancient web page from a galaxy far far away, where we just simply can't decipher what crucial information the image conveys, but then we're in the same situation as the user who needs that alternate text. Ian has posted examples of a blind user composing a page. But again that underscores the same misconception. The author of the page doesn't even have to know what the image looks like to produce suitable alt text. The author of the page merely needs to know why they wanted to place the image on the page in the first place (all other text related to the image belongs elsewhere). An author might even work with graphic designers who will provide the image much later in the design process. In that case the author might include an img element with alt value but no src value (e.g., <img alt='an idea for after the final exam' src='' > ). A content management system, or subsequent author may later provide the URI for src. So my sense is that so much of the discussion of this issue is simply a misunderstanding about what the semantics of the alt attribute convey. I think once we get on the same page about that, we'll agree that we're still looking for use cases to omit alt and also that their is very little hardship in requiring alt. Take care, Rob
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 17:38:24 UTC