- From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 17:10:33 +0200
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote: > Olivier GENDRIN writes: > > And the content would be tainted by the result of the image analysis. > > A single image can have thousands of meanings, which one will choose > > the image analysis? Will it have also to analyse the context to guess > > a probable meaning ? > > Sure, that's unfortunate. But we're in a situation where that data > simply doesn't exist; it's far from ideal, but it happens. The HTML 5 > spec can't magic that data out of nowhere, so heuristics are the best > that can be done. > > The only questions are where's the best place to perform those > heuristics, and should pages which require such heuristics be deemed > valid webpages/ Let's imagine a situation : i'm blind and i'm reading a contract to buy something. In that online contract, there is an image conveying an important information that misses @alt. The heuristic of my UA leads to understand something completly wrong, that leads my company to loose an important amount of money. Who will I suit ? -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 15:11:13 UTC