Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> 3. Offline Application Caching APIs -- not sure that using >> "server.cgi" as a name is a good idea over here; my understanding was >> that Cool URIs Do Not Change, thus encoding some technology-specific >> extension into an URI generally is not a good idea. Suggest to simply >> use something like "events". > > I think "server.cgi" more accurately indicates it takes a URI than if we > just used the "events" so I left at is. (If the technology changes a > permanent redirect can be used or you simply change the type using a > ForceType directive or something like that. Should not be much trouble.) Well, not convinced. I don't see how "server.cgi" looks more like a URI than "events". Actually, it looks like a filename to me. In doubt, put in something with an absolute path, or even a full URI. >> - "...that takes up one mebibyte of storage." -- Typo? > > This no longer appears in the draft. (It was not a typo though, a > mebibyte is the "official" name for 1024^2 bytes.) That may be true, but in this particular case is totally useless as it doesn't matter whether it's 1000000 or 1024^2, but it *does* distract. Thanks for the other changes. BR, JulianReceived on Saturday, 3 May 2008 09:25:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:30 UTC